Former US President Donald Trump has claimed that Russian President Vladimir Putin has agreed not to carry out attacks on Ukrainian cities during a particularly severe winter cold spell. According to Trump, the decision was taken due to humanitarian concerns as extreme freezing temperatures have left large parts of Ukraine vulnerable, especially amid damage to energy and heating infrastructure.

Speaking publicly, Trump said he personally communicated with Putin and urged him to avoid strikes on major Ukrainian cities during what he described as an exceptionally cold week. Trump stated that Putin responded positively to the request, indicating that Russian forces would refrain from targeting urban areas during this period to prevent further civilian suffering.

Ukraine has faced repeated attacks on power grids, heating systems, and critical infrastructure since the start of the conflict, making winter conditions especially dangerous for civilians. Sub-zero temperatures increase the risk of humanitarian emergencies, particularly for children, the elderly, and displaced populations. Trump suggested that the pause, if implemented, would help prevent a worsening of living conditions during the cold snap.

However, the claim has drawn cautious reactions, as there has been no official confirmation from the Kremlin regarding any agreement to halt attacks. Russian authorities have not publicly acknowledged Trump’s statement, and independent verification remains limited. Ukrainian officials have also refrained from fully confirming the arrangement, though some welcomed any reduction in strikes that could ease pressure on civilians during harsh weather.

Analysts note that temporary pauses in fighting during extreme weather are not unprecedented, especially when infrastructure damage could lead to large-scale humanitarian fallout. Still, experts warn that such pauses are often informal and short-lived, lacking the guarantees of formal ceasefire agreements.

The announcement comes amid ongoing international efforts to manage escalation in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has entered another difficult winter phase. Energy security remains a major concern, with Ukrainian cities struggling to maintain electricity, heating, and water supplies following repeated missile and drone attacks.

Trump’s comments have also sparked political debate, particularly regarding his role and influence in international diplomacy. Supporters argue that any effort to reduce civilian harm should be welcomed, while critics point out that claims of private agreements without official backing should be treated with caution.

Despite the uncertainty, humanitarian organizations have emphasized the importance of even temporary reductions in hostilities during extreme cold. A pause in attacks could allow emergency repairs, improve access to heating, and reduce risks to millions of civilians already affected by the conflict.

Whether the reported pause holds throughout the cold week remains to be seen. Observers continue to monitor developments closely, as conditions on the ground and official responses from Moscow and Kyiv will determine if the situation translates into meaningful relief for Ukrainian cities.