India, November 11, 2026: Brazil electoral court fines Meta, sees no deliberate election bias. The Hindu reported the development in a detailed account.

According to The Hindu, Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more.

Unlock these with Subscription The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective. First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming. Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features. Published - November 11, 2026 07:14 pm IST - SAO PAULO Brazilian Electoral Court Minister Marco Aurelio Bellizze, the rapporteur in the case against Meta attends a hearing by Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE) to review a lawsuit filed by President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's campaign accusing Meta of favouring presidential candidate Flavio Bolsonaro in the distribution of political content on its platforms during the 2026 election campaign, in Brasilia, Brazil, November 10, 2026 | Photo Credit: Reuters Brazil's electoral authority fined Meta's Facebook 7.5 million reais ($1.34 million) for failing to fully comply ​with judicial orders during last month's Presidential election runoff campaign, but said there ‌was no evidence so far that the company had ​deliberately acted to influence the outcome. In a unanimous decision, ⁠the country's top electoral court (TSE) ruled on Tuesday (November 10, 2026) that Facebook had failed to adequately meet court demands related to allegations that its ‌platform treated content from the rival campaigns of leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and right-wing Senator ‌Flavio Bolsonaro differently.

Lula's coalition filed a complaint ahead of the ‌vote alleging ⁠restrictions on the distribution of its posts, the activity ⁠of purportedly inauthentic accounts, failures in identifying AI-generated content, and asymmetries in the operation of Meta's tools. Meta told the Court last month it had adopted ​measures to ensure equal treatment of ‌the two campaigns. It did not immediately reply to a fresh request for comment.

The report is filed here under World. The Hindu is the account this copy follows, and the article above keeps the detail that report gave. Nothing beyond those reported details is added.